February 25, 2025 | CEO, Our Thinking
Executive Decision-Making in the Age of AI and Big Data
Artificial intelligence (AI) and big data have emerged as pillars of modern business strategy. According to a recent IBM study, 72% of top-performing CEOs agree the competitive edge will go to companies with the most advanced generative AI. Reports also reveal 77.6% of organizations are driving innovation with big data, showing the growing value of customer intelligence in the battle for market share.
Leaders are capable of making more precise decisions than ever. Today, technology can produce accurate insights from large-scale datasets at unmatched speed—yet this advancement has urged leaders to elevate their executive decision-making beyond the boundaries they once knew. The future belongs to those who can effectively combine the power of AI and big data to redefine success.
The productivity gains unleashed by modern technologies are increasingly extending into high-level tasks. According to McKinsey, generative AI has the potential to absorb 60-70% of workloads today—primarily impacting knowledge work with higher compensation and education requirements. Paired with the big data, which is made available by the vast capabilities of modern analytics tools, the accuracy of AI has never been greater.
There are tremendous benefits to this digital transformation. Leaders can now get real-time insights, as well as automated alerts for operational inefficiencies, cybersecurity concerns, and emerging trends that help them act fast. AI and big data are rapidly accelerating executive decision-making, sparking quicker responses to both opportunities and risks.
However, traditional ways of thinking and strategizing are no longer viable in the C-suite. Executives are increasingly challenged to proactively embrace change and adapt at a rapid pace. As digital transformation advances, slow or reactive decision-making will increasingly hinder organizational resilience. Agile, data-backed executive decision-making is most conducive to success in an environment defined by innovation and disruption.
The full value of AI and big data hinges on how they are integrated into leadership strategies. To fully unlock their potential, executives must embrace these technologies as collaborators in the decision-making process—augmenting their own capabilities with precision, speed, and actionable insights.
In doing so, executives may find the very scope of their decision-making changed. Data analytics is no longer the sole responsibility of the Chief Data Officer, Chief Information Officer, or any dedicated team. Instead, it has become democratized, informing all operations and consistently leveraged by every member of an effective C-suite. A Harvard Business Review study found that when their organization holistically excels at transforming big data and AI into value, they are significantly more likely to improve in these areas, compared to competitors:
For executives, this evolution has brought a fundamental change in their roles. As tasks like direct data analysis and market research are shifted to AI models, senior leaders are focusing on strategic development and alignment across the organization. They are translating the rich information provided by modern technologies into cohesive plans that spark action across departments.
However, effective collaboration between human ingenuity and machine intelligence also requires executives to practice risk management to eliminate the uncertainty of transformation.
Executive decisions around technology investments can have far-reaching implications. When leaders choose to harness the productivity gains offered by AI and big data, for example, they also contend with new data privacy, compliance, and ethical concerns.
The executives who are most adept at managing these risks are those who precede adoption with a thorough evaluation of potential challenges. According to PwC, a company’s top five GenAI use cases will drive 50-80% of the value realized; therefore, it is critical to assess and prioritize usage scenarios based on financial impact, level of disruption, and ease of adoption.
Once the optimal use cases are identified, high-performing companies achieve organizational readiness before implementation. Amid digital transformation, this is where effective executive decision-making can drive tremendous value. Leaders are optimizing AI performance by rethinking workflows—crafting hybrid frameworks that best leverage the strengths of technology and professionals—and contributing to a comprehensive AI strategy. As a recent report states, “people, process, and data readiness are required in addition to technology readiness to achieve long-term operational success with AI.”
So, what exactly does it take to achieve people readiness? The acceleration of digital transformation—paired with the continued importance of humans in the loop—has made human resources a leading concern for virtually all executives. An IBM study found 64% of CEOs agree organizations must adopt technologies that are evolving faster than workers can adapt. Furthermore, 61% say their generative AI adoption is accelerating faster than employees are comfortable with.
These challenges have added nuance to executive decision-making. Leaders are no longer solely considering what tools they should adopt. They must also determine if their employees are capable of effectively learning and leveraging certain technologies. Executives can support adoption by investing in training—for example, providing AI literacy courses that help employees identify hallucinations and understand prompt engineering—but ultimately, human capabilities will impact implementation timelines.
The advent of generative AI and big data has also turned top executives into ethical decision-makers. With every use case, leaders must balance the drive for efficiency with the emotional needs of the workforce or risk further labor shortages as AI anxieties hinder retention.
Achieving maximum value depends on a delicate balance between driving full speed ahead on technology and crafting a strategy that aligns an organization’s core cultural demands.